I want so bad to like this book…I really do. I have a lot of appreciation for books/people who challenge my thinking and push me to think about things differently. But I’m finding Why I’m Not Emergent to be so packed full of generalities it’s almost worthless. The intentions of the authors are admirable: to describe the Emergent Church Movement and present some of the most troublesome characteristics of it. But in their attempt, they’ve lumped all Emergent Christians into the same broad categories.
Let me offer this description of the Emergent Church: While the Emergent Church is frequently placed in its own category (Reformed, Baptist, Emergent), I’m not convinced this is possible. I’ve always seen Emergent Christianity better placed in categories like Traditional, Contemporary, Liturgical, Seeker, etc. As such, the broader movement is simply a sub-category of Evangelical/Non-Denominational; however, proponents can be found in virtually any and every Christian group. This also means that the Emergent Church is not so defined by its theological convictions as it is by its preferred way of “doing” church. Obviously, “doing” church is always accompanied by certain theological convictions regarding what church is, how to use the Bible, leadership, and others, but those aren’t the primary things.
In chapter 5, DeYoung seems to be trying to point out the inherent contradiction between the common emergent protestation against “propositions” while also affirming various theological beliefs. The chapter is left with more questions (how emergent
) than answers.
DeYoung is operating with a very basic definition of “propositions;” for him, propositions are nothing more than statements of theological convictions. In other words, “Jesus is God” is a proposition. Technically he’s correct. But what he’s neglecting is the shift that has taken place in how propositions are now being used in many evangelical churches today. My personal experience is that propositions don’t stop with the basic fundamentals of the Christian faith – i.e. the minimum “requirements” to be a Christian. Rather, many churches have developed a long list of propositions that include everything from theological convictions to social and political beliefs. I’m fairly confident to say that that’s where the problem lies. DeYoung adequately proves that it’s impossible for a church to not have some propositions (in the most basic sense), but fails to address the reality a significant number of Western churches practice. And yet, I’m not sure there are too many Emergents that would deny the validity of what DeYoung argues.
Filed under: Book Review, Christian Living, Christianity, Culture, Leadership, Ministry, Philosophy, Theology

People Talk